Advertisement
White Settlement Asbestos Legal Questions: Navigating the Complexities of Claiming Compensation
Asbestos exposure has devastating consequences, leaving a trail of suffering and often, tragically, premature death. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with an asbestos-related illness after living in or working near White Settlement, Texas, you're likely facing a complex and emotionally challenging situation. Understanding your legal rights and options is crucial. This comprehensive guide tackles the key legal questions surrounding asbestos exposure in White Settlement, empowering you to navigate the process effectively and pursue the compensation you deserve. We’ll delve into the intricacies of asbestos litigation, the importance of gathering evidence, and the strategies for building a strong legal case.
Understanding Asbestos-Related Illnesses and Liability in White Settlement
Asbestos, a naturally occurring fibrous mineral, was once widely used in construction materials. Exposure, even to small amounts over extended periods, can lead to serious illnesses like mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. In White Settlement, as in many older communities, asbestos may have been present in homes, schools, factories, and other buildings. Identifying the source of your exposure is a critical first step in building a legal case. This often involves meticulous research into property history, employment records, and any potential environmental factors. Liability can fall on various parties, including property owners, employers, manufacturers, and distributors of asbestos-containing products. Determining who bears responsibility requires thorough investigation and expert legal counsel.
Identifying Potential Sources of Asbestos Exposure in White Settlement
Pinpointing the source of asbestos exposure is paramount in a successful legal claim. This often involves painstaking research. In White Settlement, potential sources could include:
Older homes and buildings: Many structures built before the widespread ban on asbestos contained asbestos-containing materials in insulation, roofing, flooring, and other components. If you lived in or worked in an older building in White Settlement, asbestos fibers might have been released during renovations, demolition, or simply through natural wear and tear.
Former industrial sites: White Settlement, like many towns, may have had industrial sites that used or manufactured asbestos-containing products. If you worked at such a site, you may have been exposed to asbestos fibers. Identifying these sites and the companies involved is key.
Occupational exposure: If your work history involved handling or working near asbestos-containing materials in White Settlement, you may have a valid claim. This could include jobs in construction, manufacturing, shipbuilding, or any other industry that used asbestos. Thorough documentation of your work history is crucial.
Secondary exposure: You could have been exposed to asbestos through a family member who worked with asbestos. If a loved one brought asbestos fibers home on their clothing, you could have inhaled them. This is a less common but still valid type of exposure.
Gathering Essential Evidence for Your White Settlement Asbestos Case
Building a strong legal case requires compiling compelling evidence. This evidence should demonstrate:
Asbestos exposure: Medical records documenting your diagnosis of an asbestos-related illness are critical. These records should include details about your symptoms, test results, and the physician's assessment.
Exposure source: Evidence linking your illness to a specific source of asbestos exposure is vital. This could include employment records, building permits, environmental testing reports, and witness testimonies. Photos of the building(s) where you were exposed, if available, can be very helpful.
Negligence: You must demonstrate that the responsible party acted negligently, failing to take reasonable precautions to prevent asbestos exposure. This might involve showing a lack of proper safety measures, failure to warn of asbestos hazards, or inadequate disposal of asbestos-containing materials.
The process of evidence gathering can be complex and time-consuming. An experienced asbestos attorney can guide you through this process, ensuring you collect all the necessary evidence to strengthen your case.
The Role of an Asbestos Attorney in White Settlement
Navigating the legal complexities of an asbestos claim can be overwhelming. An experienced asbestos attorney in White Settlement can provide invaluable assistance, including:
Investigating your case: They will meticulously investigate the potential sources of your asbestos exposure, gathering crucial evidence to support your claim.
Determining liability: They will identify the responsible parties and build a compelling case against them.
Negotiating a settlement: They will negotiate with insurance companies and other parties to secure a fair settlement on your behalf.
Representing you in court: If a settlement cannot be reached, they will represent you in court, advocating for your rights and ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve.
Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Asbestos Claims in Texas
Texas has specific statutes of limitations for asbestos claims. These limitations dictate the timeframe within which you can file a lawsuit. Missing the deadline can severely impact your ability to pursue compensation. The specifics vary depending on the type of claim and the specific circumstances, so immediate legal advice is crucial. Your attorney can advise you on the applicable deadlines and ensure your claim is filed promptly.
Financial Compensation for Asbestos-Related Illnesses
Financial compensation in asbestos cases can cover various expenses, including:
Medical expenses: This includes the costs of diagnosis, treatment, ongoing care, and medication related to your asbestos-related illness.
Lost wages: If your illness prevents you from working, compensation can cover lost income and future earning potential.
Pain and suffering: You may be entitled to compensation for the physical and emotional distress caused by your illness.
Funeral and burial expenses (in wrongful death cases): If a loved one died from an asbestos-related illness, compensation may cover funeral and burial expenses.
Article Outline: White Settlement Asbestos Legal Questions
I. Introduction: Hook the reader with a compelling story or statistic about asbestos exposure and its consequences. Briefly outline the article's content.
II. Understanding Asbestos-Related Illnesses and Liability: Define asbestos-related illnesses and explain potential sources of liability in White Settlement.
III. Identifying Potential Sources of Asbestos Exposure: Detail potential exposure sources in White Settlement (homes, workplaces, etc.).
IV. Gathering Essential Evidence: Outline the critical evidence needed for a successful claim.
V. The Role of an Asbestos Attorney: Discuss the importance of legal representation and the services an attorney provides.
VI. Understanding the Statute of Limitations: Explain Texas's statutes of limitations for asbestos claims.
VII. Financial Compensation: Describe the types of compensation available in asbestos cases.
VIII. Case Study Example (Optional): Showcase a hypothetical or anonymized case to illustrate the process.
IX. Conclusion: Reiterate key points and encourage readers to seek legal advice.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What are the common asbestos-related illnesses? Mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis are the most prevalent.
2. How do I find an asbestos attorney in White Settlement? Online legal directories or referrals from your doctor are good starting points.
3. Is there a time limit to file an asbestos claim? Yes, Texas has statutes of limitations; seek legal advice immediately.
4. What type of evidence is needed for an asbestos claim? Medical records, employment records, and evidence linking exposure to a specific source.
5. Can I claim for pain and suffering? Yes, compensation can include pain and suffering alongside medical and lost wage expenses.
6. What if I can't afford an attorney? Many attorneys offer free initial consultations and may work on a contingency fee basis.
7. What happens if my claim is denied? An attorney can help appeal the decision or proceed to trial.
8. What is a contingency fee arrangement? The attorney only gets paid if they win your case.
9. Can family members file a claim if someone died from asbestos exposure? Yes, wrongful death lawsuits are possible.
Related Articles:
1. Asbestos Exposure and Mesothelioma in Texas: A detailed look at mesothelioma and its link to asbestos exposure.
2. Understanding Asbestos Litigation in Texas: An overview of the legal process for asbestos claims in Texas.
3. Texas Statutes of Limitations for Asbestos Claims: A comprehensive guide to the legal deadlines for filing claims.
4. Finding the Right Asbestos Attorney in Texas: Tips on selecting a qualified and experienced attorney.
5. The Costs Associated with Asbestos-Related Illnesses: A breakdown of potential medical and financial expenses.
6. Asbestos Awareness and Prevention in Texas: Information on asbestos awareness and prevention strategies.
7. Occupational Exposure to Asbestos: Legal Rights and Remedies: Focuses on workplace exposure and legal recourse.
8. Secondary Exposure to Asbestos: Understanding the Risks: Discusses the risks of secondary asbestos exposure from family members.
9. Wrongful Death Claims Related to Asbestos Exposure in Texas: Covers the legal aspects of wrongful death claims involving asbestos.
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Finding Solutions to the Asbestos Litigation Problem United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Administrative Overnight and the Courts, 2001 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Perspectives on Causation Richard Goldberg, 2011-10-21 The chapters in this volume arise from a conference held at the University of Aberdeen concerning the law of causation in the UK, Commonwealth countries, France and the USA. The distinguished group of international experts who have contributed to this book examine the ways in which legal doctrine in causation is developing, and how British law should seek to influence and be influenced by developments in other countries. As such, the book will serve as a focal point for the study of this important area of law. The book is organised around three themes - the black letter law, scientific evidence, and legal theory. In black letter law scholarship, major arguments have emerged about how legal doctrine will develop in cases involving indeterminate defendants and evidential gaps in causation. Various chapters examine the ways in which legal doctrine should develop over the next few years, in particular in England, Scotland, Canada and the USA, including the problem of causation in asbestos cases. In the area of scientific evidence, its role in the assessment of causation in civil litigation has never been greater. The extent to which such evidence can be admitted and used in causation disputes is controversial. This section of the book is therefore devoted to exploring the role of statistical evidence in resolving causation problems, including recent trends in litigation in the UK, USA, Australia and in France and the question of liability for future harm. In the legal theory area, the so-called NESS (necessary element in a sufficient set) test of causation is discussed and defended. The importance of tort law responding to developing science and observations from the perspective of precaution and indeterminate causation are also explored. The book will be of interest to legal academics, policy makers in the field, specialist legal practitioners, those in the pharmaceutical and bioscience sectors, physicians and scientists. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Asbestos and its Diseases John E. Craighead, 2008-03-25 Although asbestos was once considered a miracle mineral, today even the word itself has ominous implications for all strata of our society. Incorporated in the past into over 3000 different industrial and consumer products, as well as in building materials and military equipment, opportunities for exposure continue to be ever present in our environment. Of all of us who are potentially exposed, blue collar workers are at greatest risk. Countless thousands of workers and servicemen in a wide variety of trades were disabled or have died consequent to the health effects of asbestos, and many more can be expected to be affected in years to come. Litigation continues, and financial awards in the billions have bankrupt many Fortune 500 companies and numerous smaller companies. While one might implicate our forefathers in this widespread, relentless medical catastrophe, it has been only in recent decades that science has appreciated the complexities of the problem and the long latencies before the asbestos-associated diseases appear clinically. After all these years, prevention remains the hallmark of disease control, as modern treatments remain, to a large extent, futile. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement Michelle T. Grando, 2009-12-24 This book examines how a World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement panel formulates its conclusions with respect to the facts of a dispute brought before it. It does so by discussing the legal concepts which shape the process of fact-finding, analysing the approach taken by panels thus far and offering suggestions for improvement. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: A Patient's Guide to Mesothelioma Joseph Belluck, 2013-05-06 Mesothelioma is a relatively rare but serious illness, and it's natural to feel overwhelmed when it strikes close to home. But you don't have to face this life-changing diagnosis - or its consequences - alone. Use this book to get the information you need to make informed choices about your medical care and legal rights. And visit us online at www.mesotheliomahelp.net for additional assistance. Written in plain English, with easy-to-understand definitions of technical terms right in the text, this book is designed to serve two purposes: It's a reference for you to turn to with your medical and legal questions, as well as a personal journal for you to track your treatments and other important information in one convenient place. The book is divided into three sections. Chapters 1 through 5 cover the medical side of mesothelioma and asbestos-related disease. Chapters 6 through 8 help you navigate and understand your legal options if you (or a loved one) suffer from the effects of asbestos exposure. In the back of the book, you'll find a glossary, a list of doctors and treatment centers that specialize in mesothelioma and related diseases, and useful charts and checklists for keeping track of your symptoms, treatments, and important documents and records. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Judicial Deference in International Adjudication Johannes Hendrik Fahner, 2020-08-06 International courts and tribunals are increasingly asked to pass judgment on matters that are traditionally considered to fall within the domestic jurisdiction of States. Especially in the fields of human rights, investment, and trade law, international adjudicators commonly evaluate decisions of national authorities that have been made in the course of democratic procedures and public deliberation. A controversial question is whether international adjudicators should review such decisions de novo or show deference to domestic authorities. This book investigates how various international courts and tribunals have responded to this question. In addition to a comparative analysis, the book provides a normative argument, discussing whether different forms of deference are justified in international adjudication. It proposes a distinction between epistemic deference, which is based on the superior capacity of domestic authorities to make factual and technical assessments, and constitutional deference, which is based on the democratic legitimacy of domestic decision-making. The book concludes that epistemic deference is a prudent acknowledgement of the limited expertise of international adjudicators, whereas the case for constitutional deference depends on the relative power of the reviewing court vis-à-vis the domestic legal order. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: The World Trade Organization Mitsuo Matsushita, Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Petros C. Mavroidis, Michael Hahn, 2015 This is a comprehensive overview of the law and practice of the World Trade Organization. It begins with the institutional law of the WTO, moving eventually to the consequences of globalization. New chapters on Trade in Agriculture and on Government Procurement and Trade. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: International Law and Dispute Settlement Duncan French, Matthew Saul, Nigel D White, 2010-03-04 International dispute settlement plays a fundamental role in maintaining the fabric of the international legal order, reflecting the desire of States, and increasingly non-State actors, to resolve their differences through international dispute procedures and other legal mechanisms. This edited collection focuses upon the growth and complexity of such legal methods, which includes judicial settlement (courts and tribunals), arbitration and other legal (or what might be termed 'extra-legal') means (international organisations, committees, inspection panels, and ombudsmen). In this important collection, such mechanisms are compared and evaluated side-by-side to provide, in one volume, a detailed and analytical account of the current framework. Ranging from key conceptual issues of proliferation of legal mechanisms and the associated risks of fragmentation through to innovations in dispute settlement mechanisms in many topical areas of international law, including international trade law, collective security law and regional law, this collection, written by leading international lawyers, provides a major study in the ongoing trends and emerging problems in this crucial area of international law. This edited collection is published to mark the retirement of Professor John Merrills, Emeritus Professor of International Law, University of Sheffield, who has written widely on international law and human rights law, but is probably best known for his work on the settlement of international disputes, evidenced by the enduring appeal of his leading text International Dispute Settlement, now in its fourth edition. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: A Time to Reform United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law, 2018 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Congressional Record United States. Congress, 2004 The Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873) |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Multi-Party Litigation Wayne V. McIntosh, Cynthia L. Cates, 2010 Drawing upon insights from law and politics, Multi-Party Litigation outlines the historical development, political design, and regulatory desirability of multi-party litigation strategies in cross-national perspective and describes a battle being fought on multiple fronts by competing interests. By addressing the potential and constraints of litigation, this book offers a comprehensive account of an international issue that will interest students and practitioners of law, politics, and public policy. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Judicial Division Record , 2002 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Recent Developments in Assessing Future Asbestos Claims Under the FAIR Act United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, 2006 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Judge and Jury Eric Helland, Alexander Tabarrok, 2015-08-24 Is the U.S. tort system in crisis? CBS television's 60 Minutes has said the tort system metes out jackpot justice, and Newsweek has called America a Lawsuit Hell. Other observers of the legal system, however, argue that the tort crisis is a myth. Although both sides of the debate rely primarily on anecdote and the selective use of evidence, a sound diagnosis of the tort system requires a rigorous analysis of hard data, not a retelling of sensationalistic sound bites. In Judge and Jury: American Tort Law on Trial, economists Eric Helland and Alexander Tabarrok present their study of tens of thousands of tort cases from across the United States. The result is the most complete picture of the U.S. system of civil justice to date. Examining three of the key players of the tort system (juries, judges, and lawyers), Helland and Tabarrok conclude that the tort system is badly broken in some respects but functions surprisingly well in others. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: How Fraud and Abuse in the Asbestos Compensation System Affect Victims, Jobs, the Economy, and the Legal System United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on the Constitution, 2011 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Recent developments in assessing future asbestos claims under the FAIR Act : hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, November 17, 2005. United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, 2006 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Federal Law Enforcement Priorities United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, 1996 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency (FACT) Act of 2015 United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law, 2015 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Legal Activities United States. Department of Justice, 1992 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Legal Activities United States. Dept. of Justice, |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Asbestos Removal & Control Anthony Natale, Hoag Levins, 1984 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: In Praise of Litigation Alexandra Lahav, 2017-01-02 While the right to have one's day in court is a cherished feature of the American democratic system, alarms that the United States is hopelessly litigious and awash in frivolous claims have become so commonplace that they are now a fixture in the popular imagination. According to this view, litigation wastes precious resources, stifles innovation and productivity, and corrodes our social fabric and the national character. Calls for reform have sought, often successfully, to limit people's access to the court system, most often by imposing technical barriers to bringing suit. Alexandra Lahav's In Praise of Litigation provides a much needed corrective to this flawed perspective, reminding us of the irreplaceable role of litigation in a well-functioning democracy and debunking many of the myths that cloud our understanding of this role. For example, the vast majority of lawsuits in the United States are based on contract claims, the median value of lawsuits is on a downward trend, and, on a per capita basis, many fewer lawsuits are filed today than were filed in the 19th century. Exploring cases involving freedom of speech, foodborne illness, defective cars, business competition, and more, the book shows that despite its inevitable limitations, litigation empowers citizens to challenge the most powerful public and private interests and hold them accountable for their actions. Lawsuits change behavior, provide information to consumers and citizens, promote deliberation, and express society's views on equality and its most treasured values. In Praise of Litigation shows how our court system protects our liberties and enables civil society to flourish, and serves as a powerful reminder of why we need to protect people's ability to use it. The tort reform movement has had some real successes in limiting what can reach the courts, but there have been victims too. As Alexandra Lahav shows, it has become increasingly difficult for ordinary people to enforce their rights. In the grand scale of lawsuits, actually crazy or bogus lawsuits constitute a tiny minority; in fact, most anecdotes turn out to be misrepresentations of what actually happened. In In Praise of Litigation, Lahav argues that critics are blinded to the many benefits of lawsuits. The majority of lawsuits promote equality before the law, transparency, and accountability. Our ability to go to court is a sign of our strength as a society and enables us to both participate in and reinforce the rule of law. In addition, joining lawsuits gives citizens direct access to governmental officials-judges-who can hear their arguments about issues central to our democracy, including the proper extent of police power and the ability of all people to vote. It is at least arguable that lawsuits have helped spur major social changes in arenas like race relations and marriage rights, as well as made products safer and forced wrongdoers to answer for their conduct. In this defense, Lahav does not ignore the obvious drawbacks to litigiousness. It is expensive, stressful, and time consuming. Certainly, sensible reforms could make the system better. However, many of the proposals that have been adopted and are currently on the table seek only to solve problems that do not exist or to make it harder for citizens to defend their rights and to enforce the law. This is not the answer. In Praise of Litigation offers a level-headed and law-based assessment of the state of litigation in America as well as a number of practical steps that can be taken to ensure citizens have the right to defend themselves against wrongs while not odiously infringing on the rights of others. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: The Business Environment Paul Wetherly, Dorron Otter, 2018 The only book with a 'themes and issues' approach that encourages critical engagement with contemporary debates in the business environment. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Environmental Litigation Tom Symes, Mike Renger, Nicola Paradise, 2003 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Product Liability Duncan Fairgrieve, Richard S Goldberg, 2020-05-20 Product Liability is a recognised authority in the field and covers the product liability laws through which manufacturers, retailers, and others may be held liable to compensate persons who are injured, or who incur financial loss, when the products which they manufacture or sell are defective or not fit for their purpose. Product defects may originate in the production process, be one of design, or be grounded in a failure to issue an adequate warning or directions for safe use and practitioners advising business clients or claimants will find this book provides all the necessary information for practitioners to manage a product liability claim. This new edition has been fully updated to take account of 10 years of development in case law and regulation, and the increasing impact of cross-border and transnational sale of goods. The Court of Justice of the European Union handed down major rulings concerning the Product Liability Directive which affect the application of the Directive and national arrangements and Fairgrieve and Goldberg examines this in detail. For any legal practitioner operating in areas which require knowledge of European product liability law, an understanding of the impact of recent developments is essential and this work is an essential resource for practitioners working on product liability, sale of goods, personal injury and negligence. The work provides comprehensive coverage of the law of negligence as it applies to product liability, of the strict liability provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 1987, and of the EU's Product Liability Directive on which the Act is based. Although the majority of cases involve pharmaceuticals and medical devices, in recent English cases the allegedly defective products have been as diverse as a child's buggy, an All Terrain Vehicle, and even a coffee cup. Many cases are brought as group actions, and the book examines the rights of those who are injured by defective products. As well as considering the perspective of the law as it has developed in the UK, this edition contains detailed discussion of case law from other jurisdictions including the USA, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, France and Germany. The coverage in the work is complemented by a full analysis of issues which arise in transnational litigation involving problems of jurisdiction and the choice of laws. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Intentional Human Dosing Studies for EPA Regulatory Purposes National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, Science, Technology, and Law Program, Committee on the Use of Third Party Toxicity Research with Human Research Participants, 2004-06-04 The EPA commissioned The National Academies to provide advice on the vexing question of whether and, if so, under what circumstances EPA should accept and consider intentional human dosing studies conducted by companies or other sources outside the agency (so-called third parties) to gather evidence relating to the risks of a chemical or the conditions under which exposure to it could be judged safe. This report recommends that such studies be conducted and used for regulatory purposes only if all of several strict conditions are met, including the following: The study is necessary and scientifically valid, meaning that it addresses an important regulatory question that can't be answered with animal studies or nondosing human studies; The societal benefits of the study outweigh any anticipated risks to participants. At no time, even when benefits beyond improved regulation exist, can a human dosing study be justified that is anticipated to cause lasting harm to study participants; and All recognized ethical standards and procedures for protecting the interests of study participants are observed. In addition, EPA should establish a Human Studies Review Board (HSRB) to evaluate all human dosing studiesâ€both at the beginning and upon completion of the experimentsâ€if they are carried out with the intent of affecting the agency's policy-making. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Regulation through Litigation Kip W. Viscusi, 2004-05-13 Recent high-profile lawsuits involving cigarettes, guns, breast implants, and other products have created new frictions between litigation and regulation. Increasingly, litigation is being used as a financial lever to force companies to accept negotiated regulatory policies—policies that invariably involve less public input and accountability than those arising from government regulation. The process not only usurps the traditional governmental authority for regulation, but also shifts the locus of establishing tax policy from the legislature to the parties involved in the litigation. Citizen interests are not explicitly represented and there is no mechanism to ensure that these outcomes are in society's best interests. By focusing on case studies involving the tobacco industry, guns, lead paint, breast implants, and health maintenance organizations, the contributors to this volume collectively shed light on the likely consequences of regulation through litigation for insurance markets and society at large. They analyze the ramifications of large-scale lawsuits, mass torts, and class actions for the insurance market, and advocate increased public scrutiny of attorney reimbursement and a competitive bidding process for all lawsuits involving government entities as the plaintiffs. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: White-Collar Crime Reconsidered Kip Schlegel, David Weisburd, 1994-08-16 An exploration of the inner workings of the individuals, corporations, and government agencies implicated in the self-interested abuse of their economic and societal privilege. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Encyclopedia of White-Collar and Corporate Crime Lawrence M. Salinger, 2013-06-14 Since the first edition of the Encyclopedia of White Collar and Corporate Crime was produced in 2004, the number and severity of these crimes have risen to the level of calamity, so much so that many experts attribute the near-Depression of 2008 to white-collar malfeasance, namely crimes of greed and excess by bankers and financial institutions. Whether the perpetrators were prosecuted or not, white-collar and corporate crime came near to collapsing the U.S. economy. In the 7 years since the first edition was produced we have also seen the largest Ponzi scheme in history (Maddoff), an ecological disaster caused by British Petroleum and its subcontractors (Gulf Oil Spill), and U.S. Defense Department contractors operating like vigilantes in Iraq (Blackwater). White-collar criminals have been busy, and the Second Edition of this encyclopedia captures what has been going on in the news and behind the scenes with new articles and updates to past articles. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Constructing a Private Climate Change Lawsuit Under English Law Giedr? Kaminskait?-Salters, 2010-01-01 The issue of tortious liability for harm caused by climate change has risen to some prominence in recent legal literature. However, except for a few U.S. cases, litigation in this area remains dormant in most jurisdictions. Now, in anticipation of the likelihood - and desirability - of such litigation, this ground-breaking study examines the extent to which a claim brought by a private, public, or quasi-public claimant against a private defendant (such as a producer of fossil fuels or major emitter of greenhouse gases) alleging climate change-related damage, and based on one or more causes of action under the English law of torts, can be pursued in the English Courts. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: New York Magazine , 1986-08-18 New York magazine was born in 1968 after a run as an insert of the New York Herald Tribune and quickly made a place for itself as the trusted resource for readers across the country. With award-winning writing and photography covering everything from politics and food to theater and fashion, the magazine's consistent mission has been to reflect back to its audience the energy and excitement of the city itself, while celebrating New York as both a place and an idea. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Issues in Law and Society CQ Researcher Staff, 2001 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Product Liability John S. Allee, Theodore V. H. Mayer, Robb W. Patryk, 1984 This book analyzes the theory and practice of products liability litigation, whether the issue is drugs, food, chemicals, or any of the 100s of other products that may be the subject of litigation. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Engineering and Mining Journal , 1889 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Implications for U.S. International Legal Obligations of the Presence of the Rhodesian Information Office in the United States United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Subcommittee on Africa, 1973 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Regulation, Crime and Freedom John Braithwaite, 2018-01-17 This title was first published in 2000: John Braithwaite is a distinguished criminologist with an international reputation in the study of regulation and globalization. This collection contains his most important and influential essays in criminal justice and business regulation. It has a substantial introduction explaining the thematization of his work around the design of regulatory systems to maximize freedoms as non-domination. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Product Liability Richard J. Heafey, Don M. Kennedy, 2016-02-28 From the initial client interview through every step in building the case, this book provides hundreds of valuable ideas and tactics from the perspective of both plaintiffs' and defendants' counsel. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Environmental Protection, Law and Policy Jane Holder, Maria Lee, 2007-07-19 This 2007 book examines environmental law from a range of perspectives, emphasising the policy world from which environmental law is drawn and nourished. Those working within the discipline of environmental law need to engage with concepts and methods employed by disciplines other than law. The authors analyse the ways in which legal activities are supported and legitimated by work in traditional scientific or technical domains, as well as by certain more obscure but also influential cultural or philosophical assumptions. A range of regulatory techniques is explored in this book, through a close examination of both pollution control and land use. The highly complex nature of current environmental problems, demanding sophisticated and responsive legal controls, is illustrated by several in-depth case studies, including legal and policy analysis of the highly contested issues of genetically modified organisms and renewable energy projects. |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: Joint Resolution to Authorize and Request the President to Issue a Proclamation Designating the Third Sunday of August 1988 as "National Senior Citizens Day." United States, 1988 |
| white settlement asbestos legal question: The Rule of Lawyers Walter K. Olson, 2004-06-01 Big-ticket litigation is a way of life in this country. But something new is afoot--something typified by the $246 billion tobacco settlement, and by courtroom assaults that have followed against industries ranging from HMOs to gunmakers, from lead paint manufacturers to factory farms. Each massive class-action suit seeks to invent new law, to ban or tax or regulate something that elected lawmakers had chosen to leave alone. And each time the new process works as intended, the new litigation elite reaps billions in fees--which they invest in fresh rounds of suits, as well as political contributions. The Rule of Lawyers asks: Who picks these lawyers, and who can fire them? Who protects the public's interest when settlements are negotiated behind closed doors? Where are our elected lawmakers in all this? The answers may determine whether we slip from the rule of law to the rule of lawyers. |
